Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Poll deals climate change blow for Mitt Romney

More bad news for Mitt Romney: the Republican party's scepticism about climate change seems likely to play badly with voters who haven't yet decided who to back in November's US presidential election.

A new poll, run by Yale University and George Mason University in Virginia, has found that, when it comes to their views on climate change, "undecideds" look remarkably similar to supporters of Barack Obama.

Of the 1061 people polled, about three-quarters are judged likely to vote, based on their registration, stated intentions and past turnout. Among them, just 27 per cent of Romney backers believed global warming was human-caused, compared to 65 per cent of the Obama supporters.

Of the 87 undecideds who were likely voters in the sample, 65 per cent believed global warming was human-caused, and 61 per cent said the issue would help guide their vote.

Because the sample contained just 87 undecideds who were likely to vote, there is a large margin of error surrounding these numbers. Still, the difference between undecideds and Romney supporters was statistically significant.

"We'd have expected them to be somewhere in the middle," says Anthony Leiserowitz, who heads the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. "But we find they're very similar to likely Obama voters."

Consistent results

The results are broadly consistent with a study released in December 2011, in which a team led by Jon Krosnick of Stanford University in California presented statements by hypothetical political candidates, and asked people whether these candidates would win their support.

This suggested that Republicans, in particular, are likely to gain votes by taking "green" positions, and lose votes by expressing scepticism about climate change.

So why has the Republican party largely embraced climate scepticism? Krosnick speculates that it is due to the influence of wealthy donors who oppose action to limit climate change. Still, he doubts whether the votes gained through spending on campaign ads will counter those lost by taking a sceptical position.

While Romney has acknowledged that human activities are contributing to climate change, he cites "a lack of scientific consensus" on the issue, and in accepting the Republican nomination mocked Obama's efforts to "begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet".

Leiserowitz doesn't expect climate change to be a key issue in the election, but with the polls slipping away from Romney, the Republican candidate will need every vote he can get.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/23cd8528/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cdn2230A10Epoll0Edeals0Eclimate0Echange0Eblow0Efor0Emitt0Eromney0Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

jefferson county colorado extenze tenacious d steve smith zou bisou bisou tim tebow press conference tebow press conference

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.